No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Chile and Mexico experienced severe economic crises in the early 1980s.This paper analyzes four possible explanations for why Chile recovered much faster than did Mexico.Comparing data from the two countries allows us to rule out a monetarist explanation, an explanation based on falls in real wages and real exchange rates, and a debt overhang explanation.Using growth accounting, a calibrated growth model, and economic theory, we conclude that the crucial difference between the two countries was the earlier policy reforms in Chile that generated faster productivity growth.The most crucial of these reforms were in banking and bankruptcy procedures.____________________________________________________________________________________________ * We would like to thank the participants at the Minneapolis Fed's "Great Depressions of the Twentieth Century" Conferenceespecially Pete Klenow-and participants at seminars at the Centre de Recerca de Economia de Benestar and the East-West Center for helpful comments.We are also grateful to Edgardo Barandiarán, Bob Lucas, Rolf Luders, Jaime Serra-Puche, and especially Ed Prescott for useful discussions.Jim MacGee provided invaluable research assistance.Kehoe and Kehoe thank the National Science
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 271 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.