rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement.

Lawrence R. James · Robert G. Demaree · Gerrit Wolf

2,221 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Applied Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Reliability and Agreement in Measurement Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Team Dynamics and Performance

Abstract

Schmidt and Hunter (1989) critiqued the within-group interrater reliability statistic (r wg ) described by James, Demaree, and Wolf (1984). Kozlowski and Hattrup (1992) responded to the Schmidt and Hunter critique and argued that r wg is a suitable index of interrater agreement. This article focuses on the interpretation of r wg as a measure of agreement among judges' ratings of a single target. A new derivation of r wg is given that underscores this interpretation

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2,221 citations exist upstream.

References

1962Statistical principles in experimental design.1979Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.2012Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems 1984Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.1974The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles 1985Employee and customer perceptions of service in banks: Replication and extension.1988Superiors' evaluations and subordinates' perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership.1946Response Sets and Test Validity

Cited by

2007Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement 2007What's the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations 1999BEYOND SELF-MANAGEMENT: ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF TEAM EMPOWERMENT.2006The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria 1998Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.