An Examination of Overlap Between Reading Curricula and Standardized Achievement Tests

Abstract

The overlap between reading subtests of four individual achievement tests and five basal reading curricula was examined. Raw scores, grade equivalents, percentiles, and standard scores were reported that would be obtained if all words appearing in each grade level of the curriculum were mastered. Results showed that little overlap exists between what is taught and what is tested. Additionally, the degree of overlap varied considerably across tests and curricula. Implications for interpretation of individual standardized achievement test results were discussed.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 39 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.