The Space before Action: The Role of Peer Discussion Groups in Frontline Service Provision

Laurie S. Goldman · Erica Gabrielle Foldy

22 citations0/0 files storedSocial Service Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Social Work Education and Practice Public Policy and Administration Research Management and Organizational Studies

Abstract

Studies of street-level discretion tend to focus on what influences workers’ behaviors and the consequences of their choices for advancing or compromising policy goals, but studies rarely focus on the space before action, that is, the processes through which workers make decisions and, in particular, how they deliberate with one another about practice problems within groups dedicated to improving social service delivery. Drawing from two qualitative studies of peer discussion groups, a study of teams of child welfare workers and a study of interorganizational groups composed of employment service workers, we find that workers in each setting grappled with similar types of problems but differed in their focus on specific clients or routine tasks, how they sought to legitimate their responses, and the extent to which their proposed solutions modified established approaches to practice. Our analysis suggests that features of the accountability contexts associated with the two policy fields help explain observed differences.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 22 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Communities of practice learning, meaning, and identity 1999Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams 1986Research in Organizational Behavior.1984Research in Organizational Behavior 2003Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change 1996Creating public value: strategic management in government 1985The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action 2017The Bureaucratic Phenomenon

Cited by

2021Frontline social service as a battlefield: Insights from street‐level bureaucrats' interactions with violent clients 2021Social workers as state and citizen-agents. How social workers in a German, Dutch and Flemish public welfare organisation manage this dual responsibility in practice 2023The Performance and Development of Deliberative Routines: A Practice-Based Ethnographic Study 2020Managing multiple accountability perspectives and expectations in practice. A scoping review of the use of accountability mechanisms by social workers 2017The managerial and relational dimensions of public-nonprofit human service contracting

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.