Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The perceived functions of linguistic risk quantifiers and their effect on risk, negativity perception and decision making

12 references·16 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2002Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations21,666 cited
1987Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage11,919 cited
1968Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior.7,499 cited
2001A critique of politeness theories1,418 cited
2007Epidemiology of Insomnia: a Longitudinal Study in a UK Population583 cited
1990Politeness as universal: Cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use.306 cited
1990Verbal versus numerical probabilities: Efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox250 cited
1990Contextual effects in the interpretations of probability words: Perceived base rate and severity of events.229 cited
1994From subjective probabilities to decision weights: The effect of asymmetric loss functions on the evaluation of uncertain outcomes and events.226 cited
2008Estimating the probability of negative events138 cited
1995The elusive wishful thinking effect113 cited
2010How prevalent is wishful thinking? Misattribution of arousal causes optimism and pessimism in subjective probabilities.89 cited

Cited by

2019The Oxford Handbook of Experimental Semantics and Pragmatics119 cited
2019Thanking, apologizing, bragging, and blaming: Responsibility exchange theory and the currency of communication.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

87 cited

2013Improbable outcomes: Infrequent or extraordinary?73 cited

2016Politeness and the communication of uncertainty71 cited

2022Communicating uncertainty using words and numbers69 cited

2012To what extent do politeness expectations shape risk perception? Even numerical probabilities are under their spell!61 cited

2015A direct and comprehensive test of two postulates of politeness theory applied to uncertainty communication58 cited

2013Top scores are possible, bottom scores are certain (and middle scores are not worth mentioning): A pragmatic view of verbal probabilities56 cited

2015How to improve people's interpretation of probabilities of precipitation50 cited

2013Can membership-functions capture the directionality of verbal probabilities?50 cited

2014Some but not all dispreferred turn markers help to interpret scalar terms in polite contexts49 cited

2019Quantification46 cited

2019Constraint-Based Pragmatic Processing31 cited

2017Experimental Approaches to Linguistic (Im)politeness30 cited

2019Do people really prefer verbal probabilities?28 cited

2018Understanding ‘Unlikely (20% Likelihood)’ or ‘20% Likelihood (Unlikely)’ Outcomes: The Robustness of the Extremity Effect28 cited