SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Four layouts and a finding: the effects of changes in the order of the verbal labels and numerical values on Likert‐type scales
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Four layouts and a finding: the effects of changes in the order of the verbal labels and numerical values on Likert‐type scales (2009)Four layouts and a finding: the effects o…Web Surveys versus other Survey Modes: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Response Rates (2008)Web Surveys versus other Surv…The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? (2008)The adequacy of response rate…Do Data Characteristics Change According to the Number of Scale Points Used? An Experiment Using 5-Point, 7-Point and 10-Point Scales (2008)Do Data Characteristics Chang…Evaluating the Effectiveness of Visual Analog Scales (2006)Evaluating the Effectiveness …Likert-based vs. semantic differential-based scorings of positive psychological constructs: A psychometric comparison of two versions of a scale measuring resilience (2005)Likert-based vs. semantic dif…Survey Mode as a Source of Instability in Responses across Surveys (2004)Survey Mode as a Source of In…Spacing, Position, and Order: Interpretive Heuristics for Visual Features of Survey Questions (2004)Spacing, Position, and Order:…A comparison of Likert scale and visual analogue scales as response options in children's questionnaires (2004)A comparison of Likert scale …Response Format in Writing Self-Efficacy Assessment: Greater Discrimination Increases Prediction (2001)Response Format in Writing Se…Response Style and Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Rating Scales Among East Asian and North American Students (1995)Response Style and Cross-Cult…The Mid-Point on a Rating Scale: Is it Desirable? (1991)The Mid-Point on a Rating Sca…Rating Scales: Numeric Values May Change the Meaning of Scale Labels (1991)Rating Scales: Numeric Values…The Midpoint on a Five-Point Likert-Type Scale (1987)The Midpoint on a Five-Point …Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert-scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties. (1972)Is there an optimal number of…Reliability and the number of rating-scale categories. (1954)Reliability and the number of…The measurement of attitude (1929)The measurement of attitudePrimary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Web Survey Methods: Introduction (2008)Improving Response to Web and Mixed-Mode Surveys (2011)The value of online surveys: a look back and a look ahead (2018)Marketing Research (1970)Marketing Research (1995)Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences (2000)Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them (2020)SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature review (2021)Single Item Measures in Psychological Science (2022)The nature and measurement of meaning. (1952)Review of personality and social psychology (1980)The Optimal Number of Response Alternatives for a Scale: A Review (1980)Repeaters' behavior at two distinct destinations (2001)Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires (2003)The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels (2010)Scales for the measurement of attitudes (1967)Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items? Study I: Reliability and Validity (1971)The Reliability of Survey Attitude Measurement (1991)Designing Rating Scales for Effective Measurement in Surveys (1997)A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function (1987)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Developmental Differences in Children's Use of Rating Scales (2002)The Bull's-Eye Values Survey: A Psychometric Evaluation (2012)“Not Just Little Adults”: Qualitative Methods to Support the Development of Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes (2013)The effect of influencer marketing of food and a “protective” advertising disclosure on children's food intake (2019)Response Sets and Test Validity (1946)Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation (1991)Psychological Universals: What Are They and How Can We Know? (2005)Marketing renaissance: How research in emerging markets advances marketing science and practice (2006)Response Styles in Cross-national Survey Research (2006)Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. (1982)Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys (1991)The Psychology of Survey Response (2000)The Causes and Consequences of Response Rates in Surveys by the News Media and Government Contractor Survey Research Firms (2007)Completion Time and Response Order Effects in Web Surveys (2008)Survey research methods (1990)Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2007)On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013)Increased generalized anxiety, depression and distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in Germany (2020)The Covid-19 pandemic and mental health of first-year college students: Examining the effect of Covid-19 stressors using longitudinal data (2021)Some thoughts on Likert-type scales (2013)I Just Don't Trust Them: The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument to Measure Trust in Science and Scientists (2014)Attitudes toward Bisexual Men and Women among a Nationally Representative Probability Sample of Adults in the United States (2016)The group as a polarizer of attitudes. (1969)Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. (1974)German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: Preliminary results from the IQOLA project (1995)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done?2,579 cited
  • 2008Do Data Characteristics Change According to the Number of Scale Points Used? An Experiment Using 5-Point, 7-Point and 10-Point Scales2,118 cited
  • 2008Web Surveys versus other Survey Modes: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Response Rates1,000 cited
  • 1995Response Style and Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Rating Scales Among East Asian and North American Students877 cited
  • 1991The Mid-Point on a Rating Scale: Is it Desirable?705 cited
  • 1929The measurement of attitude625 cited
  • 1991Rating Scales: Numeric Values May Change the Meaning of Scale Labels412 cited
  • 2004Spacing, Position, and Order: Interpretive Heuristics for Visual Features of Survey Questions401 cited
  • 1972Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert-scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties.353 cited
  • 2004A comparison of Likert scale and visual analogue scales as response options in children's questionnaires330 cited
  • 2001Response Format in Writing Self-Efficacy Assessment: Greater Discrimination Increases Prediction304 cited
  • 2006Evaluating the Effectiveness of Visual Analog Scales303 cited
  • 2005Likert-based vs. semantic differential-based scorings of positive psychological constructs: A psychometric comparison of two versions of a scale measuring resilience275 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2004
Survey Mode as a Source of Instability in Responses across Surveys
243 cited
  • 1954Reliability and the number of rating-scale categories.182 cited
  • 1987The Midpoint on a Five-Point Likert-Type Scale160 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.