SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Selecting national items for the WHOQOL: conceptual and psychometric considerations · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleSelecting national items for the WHOQOL: conceptual and psychometric considerations

Suzanne M. Skevington1999

Article1999

Selecting national items for the WHOQOL: conceptual and psychometric considerations

Suzanne M. Skevington · Shekhar Saxena

74 citations·0/0 files stored·Social Science & Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Health Education and Validation

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 74 citations exist upstream.

References

1992The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.1992The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)1998Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment 1995The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization 1981The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure 1998The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties 1995Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study.1994Development of the WHOQOL: Rationale and Current Status

Cited by

2004Can we identify the poorest quality of life? Assessing the importance of quality of life using the WHOQOL-100 2018How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change 2004Is the Evaluation of the Global Quality of Life Determined by Emotional Status?2011The development of culturally-sensitive measures for research on ageing

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2000Quality of life assessment: validation of the Italian version of the WHOQOL-Briefarticle · 8 shared references 2000O instrumento de avaliação de qualidade de vida da Organização Mundial da Saúde (WHOQOL-100): características e perspectivasarticle · 7 shared references 2011The WHO quality of life (WHOQOL) questionnaire: Spanish development and validation studiesarticle · 7 shared references 2007Critical Review of Generic and Dermatology-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life Instrumentsreview · 6 shared references 2004Quality of life in the Danish general population – normative data and validity of WHOQOL-BREF using Rasch and item response theory modelsarticle · 6 shared references 2007To measure or not to measure? Reviewing the assessment of spirituality and religion in health-related quality of lifearticle · 6 shared references

Details

Year1999

Typearticle

Published1999-02-01

VenueSocial Science & Medicine

ISSN-L0277-9536

Languageen

Citations74

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Identifiers

doi10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00355-4

openalex_workW2028931963

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.