The Discipline of Philosophy in Strength and Conditioning

Brian T. Gearity

12 citations0/0 files storedStrength and conditioning journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Sports Science and Education Sports Performance and Training Sport Psychology and Performance

Abstract

ALTHOUGH THE FIELD OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING IS ABUNDANT WITH RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY WITH RESPECT TO THE EXERCISE OR SPORT SCIENCES, LESS IS KNOWN ABOUT PHILOSOPHY. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO REVIEW HOW THE TERM PHILOSOPHY HAS BEEN USED IN STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING, TO CLARIFY ITS USE, AND TO ARGUE FOR ITS INCLUSION AS A DISCIPLINE IN THE FIELD. FURTHERMORE, THIS PAPER PROPOSES THAT PRACTITIONERS ARE “USING PHILOSOPHY” WHEN THEY SYNTHESIZE RESEARCH AND PRACTICAL KNOWLEDGE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THEIR OWN PHILOSOPHY OF TRAINING.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.

References

1984Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education 2020Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals 2007Existentialism Is a Humanism 1976Teacher as Stranger: Educational Philosophy for the Modern Age 2021Twilight of the Idols or How to Philosophize with a Hammer 1981Philosophical foundations of education 1992A Profile of NCAA Division I Strength and Conditioning Coaches 1982Philosophy, a Brief Guide for Undergraduates

Cited by

2013A Call to Improve Educational Programs in Strength and Conditioning

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.