References

• 2005Below the Bubble: “Educational Triage” and the Texas Accountability System761 cited
• 2002The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Imprecise School Accountability Measures504 cited
• 2011The impact of no Child Left Behind on student achievement486 cited
• 2002Accountability Systems: Implications of Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001426 cited
• 2009The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Student Achievement361 cited
• 2003Accountability: Responsibility and Reasonable Expectations300 cited
• 2007Teaching to the rating: School accountability and the distribution of student achievement254 cited
• 2005Measuring Academic Proficiency Under the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for Educational Equity229 cited
• 2004What Are Value-Added Models Estimating and What Does This Imply for Statistical Practice?215 cited
• 2007Are NCLB’s Measures, Incentives, and Improvement Strategies the Right Ones for the Nation’s Low-Performing High Schools?76 cited
• 2012Shining a Light or Fumbling in the Dark? The Effects of NCLB’s Subgroup-Specific Accountability on Student Achievement67 cited
• 2005The Effects of State Decisions About NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress Targets63 cited
• 2006Assessing School Achievement Progress: Comparing Alternative Approaches44 cited
• 2009The Dependence of Growth‐Model Results on Proficiency Cut Scores