The effects of selective schooling and self‐concept on adolescents' academic aspiration: An examination of Dweck's self‐theory

Anni. Ahmavaara · Diane M. Houston

100 citations0/0 files storedBritish Journal of Educational Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Education, Achievement, and Giftedness Career Development and Diversity School Choice and Performance

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dweck has emphasized the role of pupils' implicit theories about intellectual ability in explaining variations in their engagement, persistence and achievement. She has also highlighted the role of confidence in one's intelligence as a factor influencing educational attainment. AIM: The aim of this paper is to develop a model of achievement aspiration in adolescence and to compare young people who are educated at a selective grammar school with those who attend a non-selective 'secondary modern' school. SAMPLE: The sample consisted of 856 English secondary school pupils in years 7 and 10 from two selective and two non-selective secondary schools. METHOD: Questionnaires were completed in schools. RESULTS: The findings are consistent with the model, showing that achievement aspiration is predicted directly by gender, school type and type of intelligence theory. Importantly, school type also affects aspirations indirectly, with effects being mediated by confidence in one's own intelligence and perceived academic performance. Intelligence theory also affects aspirations indirectly with effects being mediated by perceived academic performance, confidence and self-esteem. Additionally, intelligence theory has a stronger effect on aspirations in the selective schools than in the non-selective schools. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide substantial support for Dweck's self-theory, showing that implicit theories are related to aspirations. However, the way in which theory of intelligence relates to age and gender suggests there may be important cross-cultural or contextual differences not addressed by Dweck's theory. Further research should also investigate the causal paths between aspirations, implicit theories of intelligence and the impact of school selection.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 100 citations exist upstream.

References

1965Society and the Adolescent Self-Image 2000An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict 1979The Social psychology of intergroup relations 1988A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.1998Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.1998Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.1982Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations 1978Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.

Cited by

2012Life Satisfaction, Happiness, and the Growth Mindset of Healthy and Unhealthy Perfectionists Among Hong Kong Chinese Gifted Students 2012The impact of an online intervention (Brainology) on the mindset and resiliency of secondary school pupils: a preliminary mixed methods study 2012Teachers’ implicit theories of intelligence: influences from different disciplines and scientific theories 2019Understanding Underachievement: Mindset, Perfectionism, and Achievement Attitudes Among Gifted Students 2020Same mindset, different goals and motivational frameworks: Profiles of mindset-based meaning systems

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.