The Typology of Literalism in ancient biblical translations

James Barr

87 citations0/0 files storedres doctae (Göttingen Academy of Sciences and Humanities)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Biblical Studies and Interpretation Translation Studies and Practices Classical Studies and Philology

Abstract

La distinction des versions larges ou litterales est trop tranchee et artificielle| toutes les versions comportent les deux aspects. L'A. cherche les criteres particuliers qui peuvent justifier cette distinction. On observe un progres dans le souci de la litteralite au cours des siecles, dont l'A. resume les raisons en conclusion. L'etude touche surtout la traduction de l'hebreu en grec.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 87 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2013The ‘apocryphal’ New Testament 2013The languages of the Old Testament 2013The New Cambridge History of the Bible 1990The Hasmonean revolt and the Hasmonean dynasty 2013Writing and book production in the Hellenistic and Roman periods 1990Jewish–Greek literature of the Greek period 1990Pharisaic leadership after the Great Synagogue (170 B.C.E.–135 C.E.)1990The men of the Great Synagogue (circa400–170 .b.c.e. )

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.