SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Chasing after the high impact
16 references·2 citing·44 second hop
Chasing after the high impact (2008)Chasing after the high impactThe mismeasurement of science (2007)The mismeasurement of scienceImpact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Impact of data sources on cit…Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis (2007)Google Scholar as a new sourc…Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals (2007)Eigenfactor: Measuring the va…Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors (2007)Double-blind review favours i…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? (2006)Is it possible to compare res…Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications (2005)Trends in the Usage of ISI Bi…Equivalence of results from two citation analyses: Thomson ISI’s Citation Index and Google’s Scholar service (2005)Equivalence of results from t…Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? (2005)Does the h-index for ranking …Bibliometrics (2005)BibliometricsChallenging the tyranny of impact factors (2003)Challenging the tyranny of im…Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)Testing and adjusting for pub…Impact factor and electronic versions of biomedical scientific journals. (2001)Impact factor and electronic …The Journal “Impact Factor” (1998)The Journal “Impact Factor”Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Scaling Social Impact: What Challenges and Opportunities Await Social Entrepreneurs (2021)Scaling Social Impact: What C…Citation, bibliometrics and quality: assessing impact and usage (2012)Citation, bibliometrics and q…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Index aims for fair ranking of scientists (2005)The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)The state of h index research (2008)An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example (2011)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)US and Non-US Submissions (1998)Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Women in Philosophy (2013)Gender, Race and Parenthood Impact Academic Productivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Survey to Action (2021)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1998)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1999)Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Exploratory Research (2020)Cultural diversity in organizations : theory, research, and practice (1993)The End of Business Schools? Less Success Than Meets the Eye (2002)Design-Based Research (2012)Analyzing the Scientific Evolution of Social Work Using Science Mapping (2014)How Social Innovation ‘Came to Be’: Tracing the Evolution of a Contested Concept (2016)How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution (1998)The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level (2007)The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index (2007)Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research (2020)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews (2015)Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economics Journals (1983)Rankings of Academic Journals and Institutions in Economics (2003)The Eigenfactor™ Metrics: Figure 1. (2008)A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator (2012)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2007Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar973 cited
  • 2007Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis676 cited
  • 2007Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors551 cited
  • 2006Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?548 cited
  • 2007Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals463 cited
  • 2001Testing and adjusting for publication bias418 cited
  • 2005Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?398 cited
  • 2007The mismeasurement of science296 cited
  • 1998The Journal “Impact Factor”206 cited
  • 2005Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications199 cited
  • 2003Challenging the tyranny of impact factors140 cited
  • 2005Bibliometrics124 cited
  • 2005Equivalence of results from two citation analyses: Thomson ISI’s Citation Index and Google’s Scholar service115 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2001Impact factor and electronic versions of biomedical scientific journals.45 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2012Citation, bibliometrics and quality: assessing impact and usage14 cited
    • 2021Scaling Social Impact: What Challenges and Opportunities Await Social Entrepreneurs8 cited