AN EVALUATION OF THE CONSERVATIVE DUAL‐CRITERION METHOD FOR TEACHING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS TO VISUALLY INSPECT AB‐DESIGN GRAPHS

Kelise K. Stewart · James E. Carr · Charles W Brandt · Meade M McHenry

64 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Behavioral and Psychological Studies Data Visualization and Analytics Statistics Education and Methodologies

Abstract

The present study evaluated the effects of both a traditional lecture and the conservative dual-criterion (CDC) judgment aid on the ability of 6 university students to visually inspect AB-design line graphs. The traditional lecture reliably failed to improve visual inspection accuracy, whereas the CDC method substantially improved the performance of each participant.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 64 citations exist upstream.

References

1982Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings 1983Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings 2003VISUAL AIDS AND STRUCTURED CRITERIA FOR IMPROVING VISUAL INSPECTION AND INTERPRETATION OF SINGLE‐CASE DESIGNS 1979INCONSISTENT VISUAL ANALYSES OF INTRASUBJECT DATA 1990VISUAL ANALYSIS OF SINGLE‐CASE TIME SERIES: EFFECTS OF VARIABILITY, SERIAL DEPENDENCE, AND MAGNITUDE OF INTERVENTION EFFECTS 1990Visual inspection of single-subject data: an empirical analysis.

Cited by

2013Single-Case Research Design in Pediatric Psychology: Considerations Regarding Data Analysis 2017A Monte Carlo evaluation of masked visual analysis in response‐guided versus fixed‐criteria multiple‐baseline designs 2017Linear Trend in Single-Case Visual and Quantitative Analyses 2015A comparison of two approaches to training visual analysis of AB graphs 2018An evaluation of the agreement between the conservative dual‐criterion method and expert visual analysis 2020How Many Tiers Do We Need? Type I Errors and Power in Multiple Baseline Designs

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.