Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

AN EVALUATION OF THE CONSERVATIVE DUAL‐CRITERION METHOD FOR TEACHING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS TO VISUALLY INSPECT AB‐DESIGN GRAPHS

6 references·6 citing·35 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1982Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings2,852 cited
1983Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings2,677 cited
2003VISUAL AIDS AND STRUCTURED CRITERIA FOR IMPROVING VISUAL INSPECTION AND INTERPRETATION OF SINGLE‐CASE DESIGNS350 cited
1979INCONSISTENT VISUAL ANALYSES OF INTRASUBJECT DATA258 cited
1990VISUAL ANALYSIS OF SINGLE‐CASE TIME SERIES: EFFECTS OF VARIABILITY, SERIAL DEPENDENCE, AND MAGNITUDE OF INTERVENTION EFFECTS221 cited
1990Visual inspection of single-subject data: an empirical analysis.78 cited

Cited by

2013Single-Case Research Design in Pediatric Psychology: Considerations Regarding Data Analysis50 cited
2017A Monte Carlo evaluation of masked visual analysis in response‐guided versus fixed‐criteria multiple‐baseline designs46 cited
2017Linear Trend in Single-Case Visual and Quantitative Analyses45 cited
2015A comparison of two approaches to training visual analysis of AB graphs43 cited
2018An evaluation of the agreement between the conservative dual‐criterion method and expert visual analysis37 cited
2020How Many Tiers Do We Need? Type I Errors and Power in Multiple Baseline Designs34 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work