SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Open access awareness, use, and perception: a case study of AAU faculty members
6 references·3 citing·37 second hop
Open access awareness, use, and perception: a case study of AAU faculty members (2015)Open access awareness, use, and perceptio…South African responses to open access publishing : a survey of the research community (2013)South African responses to op…Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) (2012)Bethesda Statement on Open Ac…Researchers' perspectives on open access scholarly communication in Tanzanian public universities (2009)Researchers' perspectives on …Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2008)Berlin Declaration on Open Ac…Open access journal publishing: the views of some of the world's senior authors (2005)Open access journal publishin…Methods for Business Research (1992)Methods for Business ResearchOpen access movement in the scholarly world: Pathways for libraries in developing countries (2023)Open access movement in the s…A longitudinal study of the evolution of opinions about open access and its main features: a twitter sentiment analysis (2022)A longitudinal study of the e…Knowledge and Perceptions of Open Science among Researchers—A Case Study for Colombia (2018)Knowledge and Perceptions of …Basics of social research : qualitative and quantitative approaches (2003)Open Access to Scientific Publications – An Analysis of the Barriers to Change? (2004)Scientific Journal Publishing: Yearly Volume and Open Access Availability. (2009)Barriers to Open Access uptake for researchers in Africa (2015)Open access behaviours and perceptions of health sciences faculty and roles of information professionals (2015)Other voices: authors’ literary-academic presence and publication in the discursive world system (2017)Scholarly communication in the digital environment: what do authors want? (2004)The open access scientific journal: an empirical study (2004)Factors influencing the adoption of open access scholarly communication in Tanzanian public universities (2010)Faculty members’ perceptions and use of open access journals (2016)From here to there: a proposed mechanism for transforming journals from closed to open access (2003)RoMEO studies 1: the impact of copyright ownership on academic author self‐archiving (2003)How library and information science faculty perceive and engage with open access (2015)The citation advantage of author-pays model: the case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals (2015)What does ‘green’ open access mean? Tracking twelve years of changes to journal publisher self-archiving policies (2016)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Opening Science (2013)Making Open Science a Reality (2015)How communication scholars see open scholarship (2022)Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: individual and perceived institutional priorities in review, promotion, and tenure (2023)Complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine researchers’ practices and perceived barriers related to open science: An international, cross-sectional survey (2024)Diffusion of Innovations (1963)Bad is Stronger than Good (2001)Twitter mood predicts the stock market (2011)Textual features of peer review predict top-cited papers: An interpretable machine learning perspective (2024)Conducting a literature review (2004)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Grey Literature in Library and Information Studies (2010)Scientific Production on Open Access: A Worldwide Bibliometric Analysis in the Academic and Scientific Context (2016)Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools (2019)Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation (2012)COVID-19 in Higher Education Literature Database (CHELD V1): An open access systematic literature review database with coding rules (2020)From Open Access to Open Science: The Path From Scientific Reality to Open Scientific Communication (2020)Foundations for a learning organization: organization learning mechanisms (2003)The Signaling Role of IT Features in Influencing Trust and Participation in Online Communities (2011)Distance education: advantages and disadvantages of the point of view of education and society (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities281 cited
  • 1992Methods for Business Research281 cited
  • 2012Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003)157 cited
  • 2005Open access journal publishing: the views of some of the world's senior authors62 cited
  • 2013South African responses to open access publishing : a survey of the research community38 cited
  • 2009Researchers' perspectives on open access scholarly communication in Tanzanian public universities37 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Knowledge and Perceptions of Open Science among Researchers—A Case Study for Colombia27 cited
  • 2023Open access movement in the scholarly world: Pathways for libraries in developing countries18 cited
  • 2022A longitudinal study of the evolution of opinions about open access and its main features: a twitter sentiment analysis9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work