Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Relationship Between Methodological Quality and Conclusions in Reviews of Spinal Manipulation

10 references·16 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
1987Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials1,253 cited
1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science857 cited
1995Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: Is there a tower of babel bias?527 cited
1992Meta-analysis: State-of-the-Science499 cited
1988Guidelines for reading literature reviews.492 cited
1994Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles480 cited
1994A Proposal for Structured Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials307 cited
1987Reference bias in reports of drug trials.222 cited

Cited by

2001A Critical Review of Reviews on the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain116 cited
2003Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta‐analyses115 cited
2002A Comparison of the Quality of Cochrane Reviews and Systematic Reviews Published in Paper-Based Journals111 cited
1998Balneotherapy and Quality Assessment: Interobserver Reliability of the Maastricht Criteria List and the Need for Blinded Quality Assessment102 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2002Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine81 cited

2001Assessing the Quality of Reports of Systematic Reviews: The QUOROM Statement Compared to Other Tools80 cited

2017Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study75 cited

2007Are benefits and harms in mammography screening given equal attention in scientific articles? A cross-sectional study52 cited

2006Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?49 cited

2009The Quality of Meta-Analyses of Genetic Association Studies: A Review With Recommendations39 cited

2005Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews39 cited

2001A METHOD FOR RESEARCH PROGRAMMING IN THE FIELD OF EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE39 cited

2006Methodological Quality Assessment of Review Articles Evaluating Interventions to Improve Microbial Food Safety32 cited

2008Need for Quality Improvement in Renal Systematic Reviews30 cited

2007State of the Evidence on Acute Asthma Management in Children: A Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews20 cited

2012The quality of reporting might not reflect the quality of the study: implications for undertaking and appraising a systematic review17 cited