Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective

16 references·16 citing·34 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
2005Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation1,390 cited
2009h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields849 cited
2008Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact810 cited
1989Problems of citation analysis: A critical review803 cited
1992The skewness of science713 cited
2007What do we know about the h index?671 cited
2006Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups619 cited
2004Sleeping Beauties in science583 cited
2011Scientific peer review563 cited
1983Assessing basic research528 cited
2001Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?499 cited
1998The Evaluative State Reconsidered.434 cited
1963New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing420 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2003Measures of Clinical Significance367 cited

Cited by

2013The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face113 cited
2011Assessing the varying level of impact measurement accuracy as a function of the citation window length102 cited
2011National research assessment exercises: a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings102 cited
2015Research assessment in the UK and Italy: Costly and difficult, but probably worth it (at least for a while)102 cited
2015Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics78 cited
2018Revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement77 cited
2012Evaluation of scientific books' publishers in social sciences and humanities: Results of a survey76 cited
2015Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web75 cited
2020Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda75 cited
2015Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles71 cited
2016Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact?70 cited
2023In which fields are citations indicators of research quality?65 cited
2013Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labels64 cited
2021The Impacts of Incentives for International Publications on Research Cultures in Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences64 cited
2016Interpreting correlations between citation counts and other indicators62 cited
2015Can A mazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books?62 cited