Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labelsEhsan Mohammadi, Mike A Thelwall2013-03-19articleScientometrics64 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Publishing and Open AccessWeb visibility and informetricsAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 64 citations exist upstream.References2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2008What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior2005Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation2009Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review2006Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups2008Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor1996Problems of citation analysisCited by2015Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research2017Global science discussed in local altmetrics: Weibo and its comparison with Twitter2016A review of altmetrics as an emerging discipline for research evaluation2015Alternative metric indicators for funding scheme evaluations2016Web Indicators for Research Evaluation: A Practical Guide2015Interrater reliability and convergent validity of F 1000 P rime peer review2018Why highly cited articles are not highly tweeted? A biology case2016Path analysis of the relationship between visibility and citation: the mediating roles of save, discussion, and recommendation metrics