S
Study
Academic Library
Search
Shelves
Open access
My library
Review
Mike A Thelwall · Study
Home
/
Author
Mike A Thelwall
130 works
· latest 2025
· 3 institutions
cluster: provisional
ORCID 0000-0001-6065-205X
Works
60 shown
Evaluating the predictive capacity of ChatGPT for academic peer review outcomes across multiple platforms
Scientometrics
·
2025
·
2 authors
·
Open access
33
citations
Evaluating research quality with Large Language Models: An analysis of ChatGPT’s effectiveness with different settings and inputs
Journal of Data and Information Science
·
2024
·
1 author
·
Open access
47
citations
Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality?
Journal of Data and Information Science
·
2024
·
1 author
·
Open access
68
citations
Word Association Thematic Analysis: Insight Discovery from the Social Web
SN Computer Science
·
2023
·
1 author
5
citations
What is research funding, how does it influence research, and how is it recorded? Key dimensions of variation
Scientometrics
·
2023
·
3 authors
·
Open access
53
citations
Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review
Learned Publishing
·
2023
·
2 authors
·
Open access
160
citations
Factors associating with or predicting more cited or higher quality journal articles: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
·
2023
·
2 authors
·
Open access
59
citations
In which fields are citations indicators of research quality?
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
·
2023
·
6 authors
·
Open access
65
citations
Why are coauthored academic articles more cited: Higher quality or larger audience?
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
·
2023
·
6 authors
·
Open access
46
citations
Scopus 1900–2020: Growth in articles, abstracts, countries, fields, and journals
Quantitative Science Studies
·
2022
·
2 authors
·
Open access
211
citations
Research coauthorship 1900–2020: Continuous, universal, and ongoing expansion
Quantitative Science Studies
·
2022
·
2 authors
·
Open access
52
citations
Word Association Thematic Analysis: A Social Media Text Exploration Strategy
Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services
·
2021
·
1 author
21
citations
Is research with qualitative data more prevalent and impactful now? Interviews, case studies, focus groups and ethnographies
Library & Information Science Research
·
2021
·
2 authors
·
Open access
100
citations
Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000Research post-publication open peer review publishing model
Journal of Information Science
·
2020
·
5 authors
·
Open access
43
citations
MEASURING SOCIETAL IMPACTS OF RESEARCH WITH ALTMETRICS? COMMON PROBLEMS AND MISTAKES
Journal of Economic Surveys
·
2020
·
1 author
·
Open access
72
citations
COVID-19 publications: Database coverage, citations, readers, tweets, news, Facebook walls, Reddit posts
Quantitative Science Studies
·
2020
·
2 authors
·
Open access
103
citations
The Pros and Cons of the Use of Altmetrics in Research Assessment
Scholarly Assessment Reports
·
2020
·
1 author
·
Open access
68
citations
Covid-19 tweeting in English: Gender differences
El Profesional de la Informacion
·
2020
·
2 authors
·
Open access
60
citations
Retweeting Covid-19 disability issues: Risks, support and outrage
El Profesional de la Informacion
·
2020
·
1 author
·
Open access
60
citations
Retweeting for COVID-19: Consensus building, information sharing, dissent, and lockdown life
arXiv (Cornell University)
·
2020
·
2 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
46
citations
Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations
LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)
·
2020
·
3 authors
·
Open access
916
citations
Gender differences in citation impact for 27 fields and six English-speaking countries 1996–2014
Quantitative Science Studies
·
2020
·
1 author
·
Open access
40
citations
Three decades of tourism scholarship: Gender, collaboration and research methods
Tourism Management
·
2019
·
4 authors
·
Open access
62
citations
Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
·
2019
·
2 authors
·
Open access
50
citations
Female citation impact superiority 1996–2018 in six out of seven English‐speaking nations
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
·
2019
·
1 author
·
Open access
50
citations
Web of Science and Scopus language coverage
Scientometrics
·
2019
·
3 authors
·
Open access
388
citations
Ageing, old age and older adults: a social media analysis of dominant topics and discourses
Ageing and Society
·
2019
·
4 authors
·
Open access
121
citations
Can Google Scholar and Mendeley help to assess the scholarly impacts of dissertations?
Journal of Informetrics
·
2019
·
2 authors
·
Open access
41
citations
Gender differences in research areas, methods and topics: Can people and thing orientations explain the results?
Journal of Informetrics
·
2018
·
4 authors
·
Open access
104
citations
Gender and research publishing in India: Uniformly high inequality?
Journal of Informetrics
·
2018
·
5 authors
·
Open access
52
citations
Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories
Journal of Informetrics
·
2018
·
4 authors
·
Open access
1,986
citations
Can museums find male or female audiences online with YouTube?
Aslib Journal of Information Management
·
2018
·
1 author
·
Open access
24
citations
Do females create higher impact research? Scopus citations and Mendeley readers for articles from five countries
Journal of Informetrics
·
2018
·
1 author
·
Open access
64
citations
Academic information on Twitter: A user survey
PLoS ONE
·
2018
·
4 authors
·
Open access
177
citations
Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science?
Journal of Informetrics
·
2018
·
1 author
·
Open access
294
citations
Early Mendeley readers correlate with later citation counts
Scientometrics
·
2018
·
1 author
·
Open access
109
citations
Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts?
Journal of Informetrics
·
2018
·
2 authors
·
Open access
123
citations
Are Mendeley reader counts useful impact indicators in all fields?
Scientometrics
·
2017
·
1 author
·
Open access
63
citations
How quickly do publications get read? The evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articles
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
·
2017
·
2 authors
·
Open access
57
citations
Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
·
2017
·
3 authors
·
other
·
Open access
57
citations
Do ResearchGate Scores create ghost academic reputations?
Scientometrics
·
2017
·
4 authors
·
Open access
86
citations
ResearchGate versus Google Scholar: Which finds more early citations?
Scientometrics
·
2017
·
2 authors
·
Open access
69
citations
Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published?
Aslib Journal of Information Management
·
2017
·
1 author
·
Open access
42
citations
Web Indicators for Research Evaluation
Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services
·
2017
·
1 author
·
book
40
citations
Web Indicators for Research Evaluation: A Practical Guide
Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services
·
2016
·
1 author
44
citations
Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books?
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
·
2016
·
2 authors
·
Open access
95
citations
Interpreting correlations between citation counts and other indicators
Scientometrics
·
2016
·
1 author
·
Open access
62
citations
ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
·
2016
·
2 authors
·
Open access
116
citations
Alternative metric indicators for funding scheme evaluations
Aslib Journal of Information Management
·
2015
·
4 authors
·
Open access
49
citations
Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 3: books and non standard outputs
El Profesional de la Informacion
·
2015
·
2 authors
·
Open access
54
citations
Chatting through pictures? A classification of images tweeted in one week in the UK and USA
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
·
2015
·
7 authors
·
Open access
45
citations
More precise methods for national research citation impact comparisons
Journal of Informetrics
·
2015
·
2 authors
51
citations
Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics
El Profesional de la Informacion
·
2015
·
2 authors
·
Open access
78
citations
Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web
El Profesional de la Informacion
·
2015
·
2 authors
·
Open access
75
citations
Why do papers have many Mendeley readers but few Scopus-indexed citations and vice versa?
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
·
2015
·
1 author
·
Open access
45
citations
Arts and humanities research evaluation: no metrics please, just data
Journal of Documentation
·
2015
·
2 authors
48
citations
M endeley readership counts: An investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
·
2015
·
2 authors
·
Open access
72
citations
Not all international collaboration is beneficial: The M endeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
·
2015
·
2 authors
·
Open access
66
citations
M endeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
·
2015
·
2 authors
123
citations
Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of M endeley user categories
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
·
2015
·
3 authors
194
citations