Web of Science and Scopus language coverageMiguel-Ãngel Vera-Baceta, Mike A Thelwall, Kayvan Kousha2019-10-12articleScientometrics388 citationsgreenNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and BibliometricsWeb visibility and informetricsAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 388 citations exist upstream.References2015The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories2009Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus2006Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases2001Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance2008Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap studyCited by2022Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases2023Google Earth Engine: A Global Analysis and Future Trends2024Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage2020Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge2020Publishing volumes in major databases related to Covid-192020The Sustainable Development Goals in Scientific Literature: A Bibliometric Overview at the Meta-Level2022What is global higher education?2022Hegemony and Inequality in Global Science: Problems of the Center-Periphery Model