Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science?Mike A Thelwall2018-03-26articleJournal of Informetrics294 citationsgreenNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.scientometrics and bibliometrics researchLibrary Science and InformationWeb visibility and informetricsAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 294 citations exist upstream.References2015The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicators2013Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services2009Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus2014Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management2016Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article LevelCited by2020Sustainable development, intellectual capital and technology policies: A structured literature review and future research agenda2018Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends2023Revisiting the idea of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities for digital transformation2020Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data2022Scopus 1900–2020: Growth in articles, abstracts, countries, fields, and journals2020Digital Academic Entrepreneurship: A structured literature review and avenue for a research agenda2019Two new kids on the block: How do Crossref and Dimensions compare with Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus and the Web of Science?2021Comparative Analysis of the Bibliographic Data Sources Dimensions and Scopus: An Approach at the Country and Institutional Levels