The Efficacy of the Use of Implicature and Actor Portrayal Labels by Non-Profits in Anti-Smoking Print Advertisements

Abstract

Differences in emotional response and overall attitude toward the ad, perceived social responsibility of the sponsor and willingness to donate are tested across 4 types of print advertisements sponsored by a nonprofit. The 4 treatments for anti-smoking ads include: truth in advertising, implicature, actor portrayal disclosure and deceptive advertising. The use of real victims garners the strongest emotional response, most positive attitude towards the advertisement, strongest perceived social responsibility and highest proclivity to donate to the nonprofit. The use of an actor portrayal label, while deemed to be socially responsible, significantly reduces ad effectiveness and willingness to donate.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.