Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Movements: Confrontation as rhetorical form

9 references·16 citing·30 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1969A Grammar of Motives3,661 cited
2017A Rhetoric of Motives2,061 cited
1951A Rhetoric of Motives480 cited
1970Rhetoric of Religion343 cited
1970Requirements, problems, and strategies: A theory of persuasion for social movements217 cited
1969The rhetoric of confrontation179 cited
1952The rhetoric of historical movements166 cited
1969Critical responses to Kenneth Burke, 1924-1966146 cited
1972New approaches to the study of movements: Defining movements rhetorically96 cited

Cited by

2010From Environmental Campaigns to Advancing the Public Dialog: Environmental Communication for Civic Engagement304 cited
1980The rhetorical functions of slogans: Classifications and characteristics90 cited
1989Speech acts and arguments86 cited
1986Gandhi and the comic frame: “Ad bellum purificandum”70 cited
1983Enacting red power: The consummatory function in native American protest rhetoric63 cited
2006Reconceptualizing Rhetorical Activism in Contemporary Feminist Contexts61 cited
2005Radical activist tactics: Overturning public relations conceptualizations

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

56 cited

1991The Episodic Nature of Social Confrontation52 cited

1981The transformation of the “old feminist” movement43 cited

1980Defining social movements by their rhetorical form43 cited

1990Refusal to compromise: The case of earth first!42 cited

1997The evolution of a revolution: Stokely Carmichael and the rhetoric of black power38 cited

1980Coming to terms with movement studies38 cited

1980A skeptical view of movement studies38 cited

1991Earth first! and the rhetoric of moral confrontation35 cited

1998Writing themselves into consciousness: Creating a rhetorical bridge between the public and private spheres35 cited