SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Intuitive statistical inferences about normally distributed data
16 references·6 citing·30 second hop
Intuitive statistical inferences about normally distributed data (1985)Intuitive statistical inferences about no…The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature. (1984)The citation bias: Fad and fa…Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. (1984)Judgment Under Uncertainty: H…Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning* (1984)Heuristic and analytic proces…Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. (1983)Human Inference: Strategies a…Structuring decision problems and the ‘bias heuristic’ (1982)Structuring decision problems…On the study of statistical intuitions (1982)On the study of statistical i…Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (1982)Judgment under uncertainty: H…Human reasoning: Some possible effects of availability (1982)Human reasoning: Some possibl…Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. (1981)Human Inference: Strategies a…Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated? (1981)Can human irrationality be ex…The role of sample size in sample evaluation (1979)The role of sample size in sa…Proportionality and sample size as factors in intuitive statistical judgement (1977)Proportionality and sample si…Behavioral Decision Theory (1977)Behavioral Decision TheoryAn explanation of conservatism in the bookbag-and-pokerchips situation (1972)An explanation of conservatis…Belief in the law of small numbers. (1971)Belief in the law of small nu…Man as an intuitive statistician. (1967)Man as an intuitive statistic…DECISION‐MAKING MODELS, DECISION SUPPORT, AND PROBLEM SOLVING (2021)DECISION‐MAKING MODELS, DECIS…Where did that come from?—Identifying the source of a sample (2014)Where did that come from?—Ide…Statistical judgments are influenced by the implied likelihood that samples represent the same population (2011)Statistical judgments are inf…How Does Repetition of Signals Increase Precision of Numerical Judgment? (2010)How Does Repetition of Signal…Origins of the Sample-Size Effect in Explicit Evaluative Judgment (2009)Origins of the Sample-Size Ef…Intuitive Judgments about Sample Size (2005)Intuitive Judgments about Sam…Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information. (1986)Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. (1986)Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. (1989)The theory of decision making. (1954)Applied Statistical Decision Theory (1962)Conservatism in a simple probability inference task. (1966)The processes of causal attribution. (1973)The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process (1977)Judged frequency of lethal events. (1978)ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX (1964)The role of theories in conceptual coherence. (1985)On the reality of cognitive illusions. (1996)The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (1986)Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model (1991)Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making (1997)Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. (1988)Teachers' Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning up a Messy Construct (1992)Toward a positive theory of consumer choice (1980)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange (1992)The Causes and Consequences of a Need for Self-Esteem: A Terror Management Theory (1986)Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. (1987)Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic (1991)Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching (1986)Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty (1992)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1984Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.5,656 cited
  • 1983Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.4,196 cited
  • 1982Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases3,643 cited
  • 1971Belief in the law of small numbers.3,244 cited
  • 1981Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.2,632 cited
  • 1977Behavioral Decision Theory1,731 cited
  • 1981Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?1,224 cited
  • 1967Man as an intuitive statistician.966 cited
  • 1982On the study of statistical intuitions718 cited
  • 1984Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning*622 cited
  • 1982Structuring decision problems and the ‘bias heuristic’228 cited
  • 1984The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature.190 cited
  • 1979The role of sample size in sample evaluation144 cited
  • 1982Human reasoning: Some possible effects of availability139 cited
  • 1977Proportionality and sample size as factors in intuitive statistical judgement65 cited
  • 1972An explanation of conservatism in the bookbag-and-pokerchips situation

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

57 cited

Cited by

  • 2021DECISION‐MAKING MODELS, DECISION SUPPORT, AND PROBLEM SOLVING10 cited
  • 2011Statistical judgments are influenced by the implied likelihood that samples represent the same population9 cited
  • 2005Intuitive Judgments about Sample Size9 cited
  • 2009Origins of the Sample-Size Effect in Explicit Evaluative Judgment5 cited
  • 2014Where did that come from?—Identifying the source of a sample3 cited
  • 2010How Does Repetition of Signals Increase Precision of Numerical Judgment?3 cited