SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reliability of Quality Assessments in Research Synthesis: Securing the Highest Quality Bioinformation for HIT
5 references·0 citing·24 second hop
Reliability of Quality Assessments in Research Synthesis: Securing the Highest Quality Bioinformation for HIT (2012)Reliability of Quality Assessments in Res…Disseminating the Best Available Evidence: New Challenges in Public Reporting of Health Care (2012)Disseminating the Best Availa…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence- Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance~!2009-10-24~!2009-10-03~!2010-07-16~! (2010)From Systematic Reviews to Cl…AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions—Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Effective Health-Care Program (2009)AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading …Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Better Information for Better Health Care: The Evidence-based Practice Center Program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2005)A simple and valid tool distinguished efficacy from effectiveness studies (2006)Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being (2014)Psychological treatments for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Research synthesis and dissemination as a bridge to knowledge management: the Cochrane Collaboration. (2004)Education and Training of Mandated Reporters: Innovative Models, Overcoming Challenges, and Lessons Learned (2010)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires (1987)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Online Prevention Aimed at Lifestyle Behaviors: A Systematic Review of Reviews (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,820 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 2009AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions—Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Effective Health-Care Program536 cited
  • 2010From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence- Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance~!2009-10-24~!2009-10-03~!2010-07-16~!329 cited
  • 2012Disseminating the Best Available Evidence: New Challenges in Public Reporting of Health Care9 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work