Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The need to reform our assessment of evidence from clinical trials: A commentary

6 references·6 citing·53 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
2004Assessing the quality of research390 cited
2005The Randomized Controlled Trial: gold standard, or merely standard?300 cited
2001Effects of remote, retroactive intercessory prayer on outcomes in patients with bloodstream infection: randomised controlled trial195 cited
2006Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study149 cited
2005A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature142 cited

Cited by

2013Value in Pharmaceutical Pricing115 cited
2013What counts as good evidence99 cited
2015A scoping study on the role of faith communities and organisations in prevention and response to sexual and gender-based violence: Implications for policy and practice61 cited
2016Empirical Legal Research: A Guidance Book for Lawyers, Legislators and Regulators31 cited
2016A Critical Review of Grading Systems: Implications for Public Health Policy20 cited
2020Beyond “prevention is better than cure”: understanding prevention and early intervention as an approach to public policy19 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work