SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Peer review and secrecy in the “Information Age”
16 references·1 citing·45 second hop
Peer review and secrecy in the “Information Age” (2008)Peer review and secrecy in the “Informati…To blind or not to blind? What authors and reviewers prefer (2006)To blind or not to blind? Wha…Should journals police scientific fraud? (2006)Should journals police scient…Reasons Research Papers Are Rejected at Accounting Education Journals (2006)Reasons Research Papers Are R…Reading and writing book reviews across the disciplines (2006)Reading and writing book revi…Peer Review in the Organizational and Management Sciences: Prevalence and Effects of Reviewer Hostility, Bias, and Dissensus (2006)Peer Review in the Organizati…Is Peer Review a Game of Chance? (2006)Is Peer Review a Game of Chan…Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance (2006)Effect of Blinded Peer Review…Thinking Collaboratively about the Peer-Review Process for Journal-Article Publication (2005)Thinking Collaboratively abou…The Open Access Initiative: A New Paradigm for Scholarly Communications (2005)The Open Access Initiative: A…Online submission and peer‐review systems (2005)Online submission and peer‐re…Einstein Versus the Physical Review (2005)Einstein Versus the Physical …Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Effect of open peer review on…The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose Between Privacy and Freedom? (1998)The Transparent Society: Will…Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 2 (1998)Peer Review for Journals as i…Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1 (1998)Peer Review for Journals as i…Peer review: reform or revolution? (1997)Peer review: reform or revolu…Understanding and supporting anonymity policies in peer review (2016)Understanding and supporting …The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists (1994)How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial (1990)Measuring the social impact of research (2001)Inter-rater agreement in the scoring of abstracts submitted to a primary care research conference (2002)Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal (2004)The Born-Einstein Letters (1971)Subtle is the Lord (1982)‘SUBTLE IS THE LORD.…’ The science and life of Albert Einstein (1983)Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average (2011)From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review (2014)The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science (2024)US and Non-US Submissions (1998)Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The sociology of science (1973)Men and Women of the Corporation. (1978)A Modest Proposal: How We might change the Process and Product of Managerial Research (2007)From Scarcity to Abundance: Scholars and Scholarship in an Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence (2023)The critiques and criticisms of positive psychology: a systematic review (2023)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors (2010)Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure (2012)How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought (2023)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Meta-analysis of scientometric research of knowledge management: discovering the identity of the discipline (2013)Ranking Games (2014)A Chronicle of Higher Education (2017)Toward a Typology of Internet Users and Online Privacy Concerns (2002)Internet privacy concerns and beliefs about government surveillance – An empirical investigation (2007)Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics (2009)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)The scholarly communication movement: highlights and recent developments (2006)Researchers' perspectives on open access scholarly communication in Tanzanian public universities (2009)From Open Access to Open Science: The Path From Scientific Reality to Open Scientific Communication (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1998The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose Between Privacy and Freedom?416 cited
  • 1999Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial415 cited
  • 2006Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance250 cited
  • 1998Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1195 cited
  • 2006Peer Review in the Organizational and Management Sciences: Prevalence and Effects of Reviewer Hostility, Bias, and Dissensus134 cited
  • 1998Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 2132 cited
  • 1997Peer review: reform or revolution?113 cited
  • 2005Einstein Versus the Physical Review100 cited
  • 2005The Open Access Initiative: A New Paradigm for Scholarly Communications82 cited
  • 2006Is Peer Review a Game of Chance?81 cited
  • 2005Online submission and peer‐review systems77 cited
  • 2006Reading and writing book reviews across the disciplines72 cited
  • 2006To blind or not to blind? What authors and reviewers prefer64 cited
  • 2005Thinking Collaboratively about the Peer-Review Process for Journal-Article Publication44 cited
  • 2006Reasons Research Papers Are Rejected at Accounting Education Journals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

33 cited
  • 2006Should journals police scientific fraud?33 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2016Understanding and supporting anonymity policies in peer review14 cited