SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Time to ensure that clinical trial appropriate results are actually published
12 references·1 citing·45 second hop
Time to ensure that clinical trial appropriate results are actually published (2014)Time to ensure that clinical trial approp…Use of Trial Register Information during the Peer Review Process (2013)Use of Trial Register Informa…Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials of Surgical Interventions (2013)Comparison of Registered and …Closing in on the Truth About Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2: Evidence Synthesis, Data Sharing, Peer Review, and Reproducible Research (2013)Closing in on the Truth About…Trial Registration Numbers Are Underreported in Biomedical Publications (2012)Trial Registration Numbers Ar…Publication Bias in Antipsychotic Trials: An Analysis of Efficacy Comparing the Published Literature to the US Food and Drug Administration Database (2012)Publication Bias in Antipsych…Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications (2012)Impact of document type on re…Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists (2011)Frequency and reasons for out…Completeness and Changes in Registered Data and Reporting Bias of Randomized Controlled Trials in ICMJE Journals after Trial Registration Policy (2011)Completeness and Changes in R…Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)Comparison of protocols and r…Compliance of clinical trial registries with the World Health Organization minimum data set: a survey (2009)Compliance of clinical trial …Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet (2008)Selective reporting in clinic…No One Likes a Snitch (2014)No One Likes a SnitchEmpirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to Track Results of Interventional Human Clinical Trials (2013)Registration Rates, Adequacy of Registration, and a Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Surgery Journals (2013)Prospective registration and reporting of trial number in randomised clinical trials: global cross sectional study of the adoption of ICMJE and Declaration of Helsinki recommendations (2020)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review (2015)Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established (2017)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. (2011)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)Exploratory Research (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Outcomes in Cochrane Systematic Reviews Addressing Four Common Eye Conditions: An Evaluation of Completeness and Comparability (2014)Cherry-picking by trialists and meta-analysts can drive conclusions about intervention efficacy (2017)Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (with examples from the MUDS study) (2017)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Exploring and accounting for publication bias in mental health: a brief overview of methods (2014)Reporting Bias in Clinical Trials Investigating the Efficacy of Second-Generation Antidepressants in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders (2015)Social Anxiety and Empathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2021)Clinical Trial Registration (2004)How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (2006)Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study (2016)Compliance with prospective trial registration guidance remained low in high-impact journals and has implications for primary end point reporting (2016)Do emergency medicine journals promote trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines? A survey of “Instructions for Authors” (2016)How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing (1999)Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications (2014)Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration (2015)Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Publication Bias, with a Focus on Psychiatry: Causes and Solutions (2013)The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors (2015)Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study (2019)Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials (2014)Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews (2014)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Outcome Discrepancies and Selective Reporting: Impacting the Leading Journals? (2015)Promoting public access to clinical trial protocols: challenges and recommendations (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
  • 2011Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials243 cited
  • 2011Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists220 cited
  • 2012Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications129 cited
  • 2008Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet120 cited
  • 2011Completeness and Changes in Registered Data and Reporting Bias of Randomized Controlled Trials in ICMJE Journals after Trial Registration Policy115 cited
  • 2012Publication Bias in Antipsychotic Trials: An Analysis of Efficacy Comparing the Published Literature to the US Food and Drug Administration Database106 cited
  • 2013Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials of Surgical Interventions101 cited
  • 2012Trial Registration Numbers Are Underreported in Biomedical Publications79 cited
  • 2013Use of Trial Register Information during the Peer Review Process71 cited
  • 2009Compliance of clinical trial registries with the World Health Organization minimum data set: a survey62 cited
  • 2013Closing in on the Truth About Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2: Evidence Synthesis, Data Sharing, Peer Review, and Reproducible Research21 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2014No One Likes a Snitch15 cited