Are there alternatives to traditional polygraph procedures?

Abstract

The most commonly used method for detecting deception is based on the assumption that lies given by a person in response to critical questions posed during a polygraph examination will elicit an identifiable pattern of autonomic reactivity. Critics of this method argue that a polygraph examination cannot detect lying because lying does not produce a distinct physiological response. They assert that the possession of information only the guilty person would be expected to have can be revealed in a polygraph examination, however, by the pattern of autonomic arousal presentation of this information elicits in a person who possesses it. In this article, the position is taken that the dependence of both procedures on autonomic measures diminishes their effectiveness and inhibits the development of alternatives. A few studies are reviewed that suggest that measures of brain electrical activity can be used to infer the possession of information in persons attempting to conceal it

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 57 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.