References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 2003Internet‐based Personality Testing: Equivalence of Measures and Assesses' Perceptions and Reactions95 cited
• 2008Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Methods: An international comparison between the Netherlands, the United States, France, Spain, Portugal, and Singapore94 cited
• 2005The importance of traits and abilities in supervisors' hirability decisions as a function of method of assessment86 cited
• 2007Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Techniques in Greece: The role of core self‐evaluations83 cited
• 2002Cognitive and GMA Testing in the European Community: Issues and Evidence75 cited
• 2005A cross-cultural comparison of perceived fairness and satisfaction in the context of hotel room pricing70 cited
• 2004Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Techniques in Spain and Portugal66 cited
• 2016Procedural Justice65 cited
• 2012The Selection Interview from the Interviewer and Applicant Perspectives: Can't Have One without the Other62 cited
• 2002Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in Singapore and the United States57 cited
• 2008Not much more than platitudes? A critical look at the utility of applicant reactions research56 cited
• 2004Job‐Seeker Reactions to Selection Process Information in Job Ads52 cited
• 2004How Applicants Want and Expect to Be Treated: Applicants' Selection Treatment Beliefs and the Development of the Social Process Questionnaire on Selection