Identifying and Monitoring Students' Learning Needs With Technology

Eva E. Chen · Margaret Heritage

92 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Educational Assessment and Improvement Online Learning and Analytics Educational Management and Quality

Abstract

This article presents initial findings from an evaluation research study of the implementation of a Web-based decision support tool, the Quality School Portfolio (QSP), developed at the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). The study focused on users' experiences with the training for and implementation of QSP. Data were collected by telephone interviews. The results show that QSP provided educators with enhanced access to more extensive and broadly founded student data and with the ability to analyze student data to identify at-risk students. Additionally, QSP was found to promote collaboration and shared planning among educators. It is concluded that technology tools, which can facilitate the analysis and reporting of educational data, have opened up the prospect of timely identification of at-risk students and interventions to meet their educational needs. Tools like this also support sound assessment practices, providing opportunities for frequent assessment and other evidence of competency beyond standardized testing.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 92 citations exist upstream.

References

1998Assessment and Classroom Learning 2013The standards for educational and psychological testing.2013Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment 2003Assessment for Learning- putting it into practice 2000Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes 2002Assessment Crisis: The Absence of Assessment for Learning 1998Does Professional Community Affect the Classroom? Teachers' Work and Student Experiences in Restructuring Schools 1999Professional Community in Chicago Elementary Schools: Facilitating Factors and Organizational Consequences

Cited by

2014Districts’ Efforts for Data Use and Computer Data Systems: The Role of Sensemaking in System Use and Implementation 2010Using Student Test Results for Accountability and Improvement 2012Conclusions and a Data Use Framework 2013Data-Driven Decision Making in the K-12 Classroom 2017Leadership for Data-Based Decision Making: Collaborative Educator Teams

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.