Preliminary Evaluation of Metro Orange Line Bus Rapid Transit Project

William Vincent

45 citations0/0 files storedTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Transportation Planning and Optimization Urban Transport and Accessibility Transportation and Mobility Innovations

Abstract

This paper provides a preliminary assessment of the Metro Orange Line of Los Angeles County, California, one of the first full-feature bus rapid transit (BRT) systems in the United States. The paper also compares the Orange Line with two recent transit investments in Los Angeles: the Gold Line light rail and Metro Rapid, a rapid bus service with limited BRT features. The assessment is based on existing performance, cost, and operational data from the Orange Line's first year of service. The study found that the Orange Line is exceeding ridership projections, reducing travel times, easing congestion, and attracting people out of their cars. It is performing better than the Gold Line, which cost significantly more, yet carries fewer riders. Metro Rapid appears to have some cost-effectiveness advantages but lacks travel time consistency and a premium transit service image. The Orange Line also offers lessons for future BRT planners. The Orange Line has suffered several collisions between buses and private vehicles, primarily because private vehicles were running red lights. Safety changes included reducing bus speeds through intersections, which contributed to higher-than-projected travel times. If safety issues were addressed, this would provide valuable lessons for future at-grade busway projects. Also, as with some other recent projects, the Orange Line has pavement integrity issues. Further research would be useful in this area. Overall, the Orange Line is providing mobility benefits and attracting new riders to an extent usually thought possible only with expensive rail systems. As the Orange Line matures, further performance analysis and evaluation of land development impacts would be valuable.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 45 citations exist upstream.

References

1998Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Cited by

2013Definition of Planned and Unplanned Transfer of Public Transport Service and User Decisions to Use Routes with Transfers 2013The effects of planned and unplanned transfers on public transport users' perception of transfer routes 2014Drivers of bus rapid transit systems – Influences on patronage and service frequency 2016Rubber Tires for Residents: Bus Rapid Transit and Changing Neighborhoods in Los Angeles, California 2016Can the use of Bus Rapid Transit lead to a healthier lifestyle in urban South Africa? The SUN Study 2013The Effect of Interchange Attributes on Public-Transport Users′Intention to Use Routes Involving Transfers 2010Features that Affect Variability of Travel Time on Bus Rapid Transit Systems 2013Factors Affecting Public Transport Use in Touristic Areas

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.