No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Abstract Chinese and American decision makers demonstrated significantly different biases while making newsvendor decisions in a laboratory experiment that utilizes the open‐ended verbal protocol analysis approach. Chinese subjects (i) asked more questions before reaching their decision, which suggests that they are more cautious when making a decision; (ii) were more frequently able to come up with a new number as their decision whereas the American decision makers tended to use one of the given numbers as their decision; (iii) were more cognizant of salvage values and as a result ordered more than the American decision makers. Due to the open‐ended, time‐consuming nature of our experiment, our subject pool was small and thus we present these results as exploratory in nature and discuss directions that are worth further study in future experiments.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 39 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.