Appropriateness of Advice: DCT and Multiple Choice Data1

Abstract

The validity of instruments appropriate for eliciting LI (first language) and L2 (second language) speech act data has been widely debated Over the past decade, in investigations devoted to establishing L2 learners' socio-pragramatic competence and performance, discourse completion tests (DCTs) have become increasingly common as ehcitation instruments for comparative analyses of native speaker (NS) and non-native speaker (NNS) socto-pragmattc behaviors This paper addresses the issue of what can be learned about L2 speech acts from the data obtained by means of English language multiple choice (MC) and DCT instruments in two experiments Specifically, the study focuses on the L1 responses of NSS and the L2 responses given by speakers of Chinese to MC questionnaires and DCTs dealing with the appropriateness of advice in common and observed situations When responding to the MC questionnaire, NSs selected substantially fewer options with either direct or hedged advice than the Chinese subjects did, which is congruent with the body of research on NS and Chinese L1 pragmahnguistic behaviors On the other hand, significantly more NSs than Chinese preferred direct and hedged advice in response to DCTs From this perspective, DCTs may not be the best ehcita-tion instrument for L1 and L2 data pertaining to ambiguous and situationally constrained pragmahnguistic acts

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 179 citations exist upstream.