'CLT is best for China'-- an untenable absolutist claim

Abstract

In his paper titled ‘The need for Communicative Language Teaching in China’, Xiaoqing Liao (2004) holds an absolutist view on the appropriacy of CLT for Chinese EFL classrooms, and claims that the methodology ‘is best for China’. The absolutist claim is based on a problematic assumption of CLT’s universal effectiveness/appropriacy, and ignores the diverse contexts of ELT in China. The arguments put forward by Liao to support his claim are specious, and the evidence presented is both scarce and unconvincing. Furthermore, the paper reveals a narrow, dogmatic understanding of what constitutes a proper method, and in the words of Harmer (2003: 288), exemplifies ‘an insensitive insistence on a rigid methodology at the expense of classroom and learner realities’.

Cite this

Guangwei Hu (2004). 'CLT is best for China'-- an untenable absolutist claim. ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci009

@article{guangwei2004clt,
  title  = {'CLT is best for China'-- an untenable absolutist claim},
  author = {Hu, Guangwei},
  year   = {2004},
  journal = {ELT Journal},
  doi    = {10.1093/elt/cci009}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 82 citations exist upstream.

References