Importance of Communication Cues in Music Performance according to Performers and Audience

Abstract

The present study was designed to investigate what types of communication cues performers and audiencemembers regard as important during music performance. Our attempt differed from other studies in that itexplored a holistic perspective of multiple cues in music performance through self-reports. The questionnairesprovided a simple model of reciprocal communication flows among four roles, namely, performer, co-performer,audience, and co-audience member, as well as 10 types of communication cues, namely, facial expression, gaze,body movement, posture, touch, interpersonal distance, verbal information, attire, breath, and musical sound. Atotal of 86 performers and 149 audience members filled in the questionnaires. In referring to this model andimagining music performances, they rated the importance of communication cues according to their role asperformers or audience members, situations (practice/performance). Performers selected the music genres thattheir performances usually play. Performers were also asked to draw stage positioning in music performance.The main findings are as follows: (1) Participants’ roles as either performers or audience members affected theiropinions about the importance of communication cues. In inter-performer communication, sound, gaze, bodymovement, facial expression, and breath were rated as highly important in both practice and performance. Inperformer-to-audience communication, musical sound, facial expression, and body movement were rated ashighly important. (2) Participants regarded similar cues as important regardless of their role: senders andreceivers of inter-performer and performer-to-audience communication. (3) Music genre (classical or popular)and situation (practice or performance) influenced participants’ opinions about the importance of communicationcues and stage positioning.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.