Article2007

Naturally nested, but why dual process?

1 citations0/0 files storedBehavioral and Brain Sciences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Categorization, perception, and language Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Abstract

Abstract The article by Barbey & Sloman (B&S) provides a valuable framework for integrating research on base-rate neglect and respect. The theoretical arguments and data supporting the nested set model are persuasive. But we found the dual-process account to be under-specified and less compelling. Our concerns are based on (a) inconsistencies within the literature cited by B&S, and (b) studies of base-rate neglect in categorization.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1 citations exist upstream.

References

2003In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning 1988Rational choice in an uncertain world 1988From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model.2000Communicating Statistical Information 2006SSL: A Theory of How People Learn to Select Strategies.1988From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model.1988Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience.1996Base rates in category learning.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.