Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Knowing the crowd within: Metacognitive limits on combining multiple judgments

16 references·5 citing·45 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.3,503 cited
2004The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations2,925 cited
1988Adaptive strategy selection in decision making.1,953 cited
2009Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation1,646 cited
1992Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model1,591 cited
1907Vox Populi1,078 cited
2006Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences1,007 cited
2000Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension883 cited
2008The secret life of fluency685 cited
1997Taking Advice: Accepting Help, Improving Judgment, and Sharing Responsibility592 cited
2009Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others’ opinions.420 cited
2006Intuitions About Combining Opinions: Misappreciation of the Averaging Principle407 cited
2008Measuring the Crowd Within340 cited
2009The Wisdom of Many in One Mind304 cited
2004The Benefit of Additional Opinions

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

270 cited

1995Judgemental adjustment of initial forecasts: Its effectiveness and biases171 cited

Cited by

2017The wisdom of the inner crowd in three large natural experiments48 cited
2016Switch or persevere? The effects of experience and metacognition on persistence decisions26 cited
2021How the wisdom of crowds, and of the crowd within, are affected by expertise21 cited
2019Rate it again: Using the wisdom of many to improve performance evaluations14 cited
2022Taking a Disagreeing Perspective Improves the Accuracy of People’s Quantitative Estimates12 cited