Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate values in climate modeling

4 references·16 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1990Science as Social Knowledge3,090 cited
2013In defence of the value free ideal255 cited
2014Nonepistemic Values and the Multiple Goals of Science222 cited
2010Epistemic Values and the Argument from Inductive Risk213 cited

Cited by

2018Philosophy and Climate Science178 cited
2021The new demarcation problem128 cited
2024The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge102 cited
2015Ontological Choices and the Value-Free Ideal96 cited
2022Values in Science96 cited
2020Risk in international business and its mitigation89 cited
2020A Taxonomy of Transparency in Science76 cited
2017Values and evidence: how models make a difference72 cited
2016The Risk of Using Inductive Risk to Challenge the Value-Free Ideal71 cited
2020On Predicting Recidivism: Epistemic Risk, Tradeoffs, and Values in Machine Learning66 cited
2016Modelling and the Nation: Institutionalising Climate Prediction in the UK, 1988–9265 cited
2015Philosophy of Climate Science Part II: Modelling Climate Change

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

59 cited

2021Does democracy require value-neutral science? Analyzing the legitimacy of scientific information in the political sphere52 cited

2023Science, Values, and the New Demarcation Problem49 cited

2018Illegitimate Values, Confirmation Bias, and Mandevillian Cognition in Science45 cited

2020Why Simpler Computer Simulation Models Can Be Epistemically Better for Informing Decisions44 cited