SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Peer Review: A Study of Reliability
0 references·12 citing·45 second hop
Peer Review: A Study of Reliability (1982)Peer Review: A Study of ReliabilityBehind the curtains of academic publishing: strategic responses of economists and business scholars (2023)Behind the curtains of academ…Uncovering Latent Biases in Text: Method and Application to Peer Review (2021)Uncovering Latent Biases in T…Peer reviewing in the contemporary academic communications (2021)Peer reviewing in the contemp…Reading Peer Review (2020)Reading Peer ReviewUnderstanding the peer review endeavor (2019)Understanding the peer review…A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science (2017)A prospective study on an inn…Navigating the Peer-Review Process: Reviewers’ Suggestions for a Manuscript (2015)Navigating the Peer-Review Pr…Aiming for Excellence: Reflections on the Advanced Institute of Management Research and its Elite (2015)Aiming for Excellence: Reflec…Records Management and Peer-Reviewed Journals: An Assessment (2013)Records Management and Peer-R…The Responsible Conduct of Bioethics Research (2011)The Responsible Conduct of Bi…Leadership Development in Business Schools: An Agenda for Change (2011)Leadership Development in Bus…Reviewing peer review: a quantitative analysis of peer review (2010)Reviewing peer review: a quan…A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION (1938)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1996)Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry (2000)Responsible Conduct of Research Training and Trust Between Research Postgraduate Students and Supervisors (2012)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Reliability Measures for Qualitative Data: Theory and Implications (1994)A Study of the Practices and Responsibilities of Scholarly Peer Review in Rhetoric and Composition (2019)A Case Study for the Interrater Reliability of Journal Referees (2021)Ensuring Sustainable Evaluation: How to Improve Quality of Evaluating Grant Proposals? (2021)Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (2011)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Does the disconnect between the peer-reviewed label and reality explain the peer review crisis, and can open peer review or preprints resolve it? A narrative review (2025)Linguistic Imperialism (1993)The scientific impact of nations (2004)Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (2011)Identifying the characteristics of excellent peer reviewers by using Publons (2022)Cultural distance, gender and praise in peer review (2024)Situated Learning (1991)Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education: Revised and Expanded from Case Study Research in Education (1998)Reading Spaces in South Africa, 1850–1920s (2020)Do peers share the same criteria for assessing grant applications? (2021)Peer review: the attitudes and behaviours of Covid-19 pandemic-era early career researchers (2023)The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (2025)Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania: Reply (2000)Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination (2004)The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations (2017)The academic status of reviewers predicts their language use (2023)Can peer review accolade awards motivate reviewers? A large-scale quasi-natural experiment (2024)Textual features of peer review predict top-cited papers: An interpretable machine learning perspective (2024)Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies (1996)The End of Business Schools? Less Success Than Meets the Eye (2002)Academic Dishonesty in Graduate Business Programs: Prevalence, Causes, and Proposed Action (2006)Bias in peer review (2012)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Organizational and Managerial Problems of the Functioning of Academic Journals of the RAS (2022)Some Reasons for the Russian Authors Transition to Foreign Journals (2022)Development of the scientific journals network in Russia: strategic, technological and organizational issues (2023)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds (2007)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The importance of international and national publications for promotion and the impact of recruitment policies (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2021Uncovering Latent Biases in Text: Method and Application to Peer Review28 cited
  • 2020Reading Peer Review14 cited
  • 2011The Responsible Conduct of Bioethics Research13 cited
  • 2015Navigating the Peer-Review Process: Reviewers’ Suggestions for a Manuscript10 cited
  • 2021Peer reviewing in the contemporary academic communications10 cited
  • 2011Leadership Development in Business Schools: An Agenda for Change9 cited
  • 2019Understanding the peer review endeavor8 cited
  • 2017A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science7 cited
  • 2023Behind the curtains of academic publishing: strategic responses of economists and business scholars7 cited
  • 2010Reviewing peer review: a quantitative analysis of peer review6 cited
  • 2015Aiming for Excellence: Reflections on the Advanced Institute of Management Research and its Elite5 cited
  • 2013Records Management and Peer-Reviewed Journals: An Assessment1 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work