SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluating the Surgery Literature
16 references·1 citing·38 second hop
Evaluating the Surgery Literature (2009)Evaluating the Surgery LiteratureInconsistencies between reported test statistics and p‐values in two psychiatry journals (2007)Inconsistencies between repor…Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies (2006)Comparison of conference abst…Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Impact factor: a valid measur…Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials (2002)Reporting Randomized, Control…One Hundred Citation Classics in General Surgical Journals (2002)One Hundred Citation Classics…Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Effects of Editorial Peer Rev…Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers (2002)Effect of structured workshop…Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles (2002)Association of Journal Qualit…Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals (1998)Statistical reviewing policie…Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Effect on the Quality of Peer…Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality? (1998)Does Masking Author Identity …Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Citation classics in clinical dermatologic journals. Citation analysis, biomedical journals, and landmark articles, 1945-1990 (1993)Citation classics in clinical…Citation Classics in Clinical Dermatologic Journals (1993)Citation Classics in Clinical…Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Peer Review in 18th-Century S…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Scientific and statistical reviews of manuscripts submitted to Nursing Research: Comparison of completeness, quality, and usefulness (2010)Scientific and statistical re…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. (1999)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically relevant qualitative studies in MEDLINE. (2004)Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE. (2006)Reporting of Safety Results in Published Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review (2007)The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals (2019)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Citation Classics in Anesthetic Journals (2004)100 Most Cited Articles in Orthopaedic Surgery (2010)The most frequently cited adsorption research articles in the Science Citation Index (Expanded) (2012)Publication and related biases. (2000)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)Top-Cited Articles in Rehabilitation (2010)The 100 most cited spine articles (2012)The top 100 cited articles in urology (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 2003Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?584 cited
  • 2002One Hundred Citation Classics in General Surgical Journals388 cited
  • 1990Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism350 cited
  • 2002Effects of Editorial Peer Review347 cited
  • 1998Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports334 cited
  • 2002Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles284 cited
  • 1998Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?278 cited
  • 1993Citation classics in clinical dermatologic journals. Citation analysis, biomedical journals, and landmark articles, 1945-1990141 cited
  • 1993Citation Classics in Clinical Dermatologic Journals103 cited
  • 1998Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals94 cited
  • 2002Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers53 cited
  • 2006Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies51 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2002Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials39 cited
  • 2007Inconsistencies between reported test statistics and p‐values in two psychiatry journals37 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2010Scientific and statistical reviews of manuscripts submitted to Nursing Research: Comparison of completeness, quality, and usefulness8 cited