SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleStatistical reviewing policies of medical journals

Steven N. Goodman1998

OA

Articlebronze1998

Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals

Steven N. Goodman · Douglas G. Altman · Stephen L. George

94 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of General Internal Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 94 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine 1966Statistical Evaluation of Medical Journal Manuscripts 1990An Exploratory Study of Statistical Assessment of Papers Published in the British Medical Journal

Cited by

2011Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact medical journals 2021Reproducible image handling and analysis 2020How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a survey 2000Common Reasons for Rejecting Manuscripts at Medical Journals: A Survey of Editors and Peer Reviewers 2022An observational analysis of the trope “A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant” and other cut-and-paste statistical methods 2012Perceived information gain from randomized trials correlates with publication in high–impact factor journals 2002Judging the judges: the role of journal editors 2019Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2020How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a surveyarticle · 3 shared references 2003Efecto de la revisión estadística en la calidad de los manuscritos publicados en MEDICINA CLÍNICA: estudio aleatorizadoarticle · 3 shared references 2000Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?article · 2 shared references 2007Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trialarticle · 2 shared references 1992The Lancet's statistical review process: areas for improvement by authorsarticle · 2 shared references 2008Wikipedia and academic peer reviewarticle · 2 shared references

Details

Year1998

Typearticle

Published1998-11-01

VenueJournal of General Internal Medicine

ISSN-L0884-8734

Languageen

Citations94

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Identifiers

doi10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00227.x

openalex_workW2010780893

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.