Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals

3 references·16 citing·51 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine324 cited
1966Statistical Evaluation of Medical Journal Manuscripts207 cited
1990An Exploratory Study of Statistical Assessment of Papers Published in the British Medical Journal130 cited

Cited by

2011Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact medical journals75 cited
2021Reproducible image handling and analysis61 cited
2020How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a survey57 cited
2000Common Reasons for Rejecting Manuscripts at Medical Journals: A Survey of Editors and Peer Reviewers54 cited
2022An observational analysis of the trope “A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant” and other cut-and-paste statistical methods54 cited
2012Perceived information gain from randomized trials correlates with publication in high–impact factor journals41 cited
2002Judging the judges: the role of journal editors40 cited
2019Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey38 cited
2002Poor-Quality Medical Research33 cited
2017Reporting and methodological quality of survival analysis in articles published in Chinese oncology journals27 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2018Statistical errors in articles published in radiology journals26 cited

2010Peer Review Should Continue After Publication23 cited

2013Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature21 cited

2018Reporting Characteristics in Sports Nutrition19 cited

2021The Quality of Statistical Reporting and Data Presentation in Predatory Dental Journals Was Lower Than in Non-Predatory Journals18 cited

2011Quality of reporting statistics in two Indian pharmacology journals17 cited