SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Lancet's statistical review process: areas for improvement by authors · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleThe Lancet's statistical review process: areas for improvement by authors

S M Gore1992

Article1992

The Lancet's statistical review process: areas for improvement by authors

S M Gore · Simon G. Thompson

87 citations·0/0 files stored·The Lancet

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic Writing and Publishing Publishing and Scholarly Communication Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 87 citations exist upstream.

References

1966Statistical Evaluation of Medical Journal Manuscripts 1980Reporting standards and research strategies for controlled trials 1986Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies.1990An Exploratory Study of Statistical Assessment of Papers Published in the British Medical Journal

Cited by

1998Analysis and interpretation of cost data in randomised controlled trials: review of published studies 2008Criteria of the peer review process for publication of experimental and quasi-experimental research in Psychology: A guide for creating research papers 2007Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial 2009The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report 2011Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact medical journals 2006Analyses of Cost Data in Economic Evaluations Conducted Alongside Randomized Controlled Trials 2006Criteria of the peer-review process for publication of experimental and quasi-experimental research in Psychology 2020How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a survey

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2004Statistical reviewing policies in dermatology journals: Results of a questionnaire survey of editorsarticle · 3 shared references 1991The quality of health services research in medical practice in the United Kingdom.article · 3 shared references 1987Towards a reduction in publication bias.article · 2 shared references 1998Statistical reviewing policies of medical journalsarticle · 2 shared references 2020How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a surveyarticle · 2 shared references 1989Meta-analysis and evidencearticle · 2 shared references

Details

Year1992

Typearticle

Published1992-07-01

VenueThe Lancet

ISSN-L0099-5355

Languageen

Citations87

Files0 public / 0

ShelfAcademic Writing and Publishing

Identifiers

doi10.1016/0140-6736(92)90409-v

openalex_workW1986404750

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.