Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Lancet's statistical review process: areas for improvement by authors

4 references·16 citing·45 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1966Statistical Evaluation of Medical Journal Manuscripts207 cited
1980Reporting standards and research strategies for controlled trials206 cited
1986Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies.144 cited
1990An Exploratory Study of Statistical Assessment of Papers Published in the British Medical Journal130 cited

Cited by

1998Analysis and interpretation of cost data in randomised controlled trials: review of published studies254 cited
2008Criteria of the peer review process for publication of experimental and quasi-experimental research in Psychology: A guide for creating research papers193 cited
2007Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial112 cited
2009The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report84 cited
2011Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact medical journals75 cited
2006Analyses of Cost Data in Economic Evaluations Conducted Alongside Randomized Controlled Trials72 cited
2006Criteria of the peer-review process for publication of experimental and quasi-experimental research in Psychology69 cited
2020How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a survey57 cited
2000Common Reasons for Rejecting Manuscripts at Medical Journals: A Survey of Editors and Peer Reviewers

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

54 cited

1995Assessment of statistical procedures used in papers in the Australian Veterinary Journal53 cited

2000Electronic Trial Banks: A Complementary Method for Reporting Randomized Trials52 cited

2012A Kuhnian Critique of Psychometric Research on Peer Review42 cited

2005A comparison of randomised controlled trials in health and education35 cited

1995Commentary: Scientific heads are not turned by rhetoric20 cited

2018Reporting Characteristics in Sports Nutrition19 cited

2009Nonrandomized quality improvement intervention trials might overstate the strength of causal inference of their findings19 cited