Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests?

5 references·16 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1982Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts.2,508 cited
1979Indirect speech acts1,393 cited
1979Responding to indirect speech acts487 cited
1975Understanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed requests381 cited
1980Polite responses to polite requests315 cited

Cited by

1986On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm.638 cited
1999On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language416 cited
2002Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal?326 cited
1995Muting the Meaning A Social Function of Irony326 cited
1999Irony: Context and Salience287 cited
1995The Alleged Priority of Literal Interpretation240 cited
1996Social psychological models of interpersonal communication231 cited
1999On feeling good and being rude: Affective influences on language use and request formulations.203 cited
1989How Context Makes Metaphor Comprehension Seem 'Special'201 cited
2008Investigating Pragmatics in Foreign Language Learning, Teaching and Testing190 cited
2007

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Expecting Irony: Context Versus Salience-Based Effects

175 cited

2005Comprehending Implied Meaning in English as a Foreign Language172 cited

1999Obligatory processing of literal and nonliteral meanings in verbal irony169 cited

2015Using Figurative Language154 cited

1986What makes some indirect speech acts conventional?148 cited

1986Comprehension and memory for nonliteral utterances: The problem of sarcastic indirect requests144 cited