Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How Close Is Close Enough: Public Perceptions of the Risks of Industrial Facilities

7 references·6 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2017The Discovery of Grounded Theory25,772 cited
1978How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits2,837 cited
1980Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk1,301 cited
2017Survey Research Methods487 cited
1948Public Opinion and Public Opinion Polling367 cited
1980Rational and personal aspects of risk305 cited
1981Judging risks and benefits in the small and in the large291 cited

Cited by

1988Taxonomic Analysis of Perceived Risk: Modeling Individual and Group Perceptions Within Homogeneous Hazard Domains151 cited
2017Communicating Imminent Risk143 cited
2006Public Perception of Population Health Risks in Canada: Health Hazards and Sources of Information124 cited
2003Hazardous waste sites and housing appreciation rates81 cited
2009Pre-empting public regulation with private food quality standards37 cited
1991On risk and risk analysis15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work