SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of U.S. medical journals.
6 references·3 citing·41 second hop
A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of U.S. medical journals. (1996)A comparison of authors publishing in two…The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The Existence of Publication …Medical Authorship: Traditions, Trends, and Tribulations (1990)Medical Authorship: Tradition…Effect of Acceptance or Rejection on the Author's Evaluation of Peer Review of Medical Manuscripts (1990)Effect of Acceptance or Rejec…Editorial Peer Review in US Medical Journals (1990)Editorial Peer Review in US M…Peer review and publication. Presidential address before the 70th annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Investigation, San Francisco, California, 30 April 1978. (1978)Peer review and publication. …Time Lapse between Hypothesis and Publication in the Medical Sciences (1975)Time Lapse between Hypothesis…Bibliometric analysis of aerosol research in meteorology and atmospheric sciences (2012)Bibliometric analysis of aero…Rebound Peer Review: A Viable Recourse for Aggrieved Authors? (2011)Rebound Peer Review: A Viable…The fate of papers rejected by Australian Family Physician. (2006)The fate of papers rejected b…The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)The ups and downs of peer review (2007)Addressing editor(ial) malpractice in scientific journals (2012)ARS Turns Fifteen: la quinceañera bonita (2012)Publicar (casi exclusivamente) en revistas de impacto (2015)The frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1926)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)A bibliometric analysis of COVID‐19 publications in the ten psychology‐related Web of Science categories in the social science citation index (2021)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS FOR MANUSCRIPTS SUBMITTED TO BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS (1988)Can authorship policies help prevent scientific misconduct? What role for scientific societies? (2003)Authorship: an ethical dilemma of science (2005)Perceptions of authors' contributions are influenced by both byline order and designation of corresponding author (2014)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Scientist as Subject: The Psychological Imperative. (1978)Is Peer Review a Game of Chance? (2006)A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating the Predictive Validity of Editorial Decisions: Do the Editors of a High Profile Journal Select Manuscripts that are Highly Cited After Publication? (2011)From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review (2014)Scientific communication: Its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge. (1971)The General Medical Journal: For Readers or Repositories? (1977)Factor de impacto de las revistas médicas españolas (2004)Constructing the Genome Commons (2014)SCI journal citation reports : a bibliometric analysis of science journals in the ISI data base. 1981 annual (1982)Little Science, Big Science...and Beyond (1986)Clinical Research in Otolaryngology Journals (1991)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)Accuracy in the Identification of Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Journals and the Peer-Review Process Across Disciplines (2003)Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals (2018)Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)Fate of articles rejected by Indian Pediatrics (2010)Cómo publicar en revistas de impacto en pediatría: papel de las revistas open access (2021)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis (2001)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Peer review of the biomedical literature (1990)How Well Does a Journal's Peer Review Process Function? (1994)Who Benefits from Peer Review? An Analysis of the Outcome of 100 Requests for Review by Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1990The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence1,413 cited
  • 1978Peer review and publication. Presidential address before the 70th annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Investigation, San Francisco, California, 30 April 1978.104 cited
  • 1990Medical Authorship: Traditions, Trends, and Tribulations64 cited
  • 1990Editorial Peer Review in US Medical Journals41 cited
  • 1975Time Lapse between Hypothesis and Publication in the Medical Sciences40 cited
  • 1990Effect of Acceptance or Rejection on the Author's Evaluation of Peer Review of Medical Manuscripts31 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Bibliometric analysis of aerosol research in meteorology and atmospheric sciences11 cited
  • 2011Rebound Peer Review: A Viable Recourse for Aggrieved Authors?10 cited
  • 2006The fate of papers rejected by Australian Family Physician.8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work