References

• 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
• 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
• 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
• 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
• 2003How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study1,181 cited
• 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited
• 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
• 2002Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study891 cited
• 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
• 1994Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests754 cited
• 1998Do Certain Countries Produce Only Positive Results? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials684 cited
• 2007External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)569 cited
• 1995Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: Is there a tower of babel bias?527 cited
• 2004Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 3. Measures of observer variability (kappa statistic)