SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Prevalence of Negative Studies with Inadequate Statistical Power
1 references·12 citing·42 second hop
The Prevalence of Negative Studies with Inadequate Statistical Power (2002)The Prevalence of Negative Studies with I…The scandal of poor medical research (1994)The scandal of poor medical r…Harnessing Social Media to Advance Research in Plastic Surgery (2018)Harnessing Social Media to Ad…A Proposal to Mitigate the Consequences of Type 2 Error in Surgical Science (2017)A Proposal to Mitigate the Co…Type II error and statistical power in reports of small animal clinical trials (2014)Type II error and statistical…Levels of Evidence in Cosmetic Surgery (2013)Levels of Evidence in Cosmeti…A Systematic Review of Power and Sample Size Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials within Plastic Surgery (2012)A Systematic Review of Power …Quality of reporting according to the CONSORT, STROBE and Timmer instrument at the American Burn Association (ABA) annual meetings 2000 and 2008 (2011)Quality of reporting accordin…Evidence-based burn care—An assessment of the methodological quality of research published in burn care journals from 1982 to 2008 (2010)Evidence-based burn care—An a…A Detailed Analysis of Level I Evidence (Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-Analyses) in Five Plastic Surgery Journals to Date: 1978 to 2009 (2010)A Detailed Analysis of Level …Evidence-Based Plastic Surgery (2009)Evidence-Based Plastic SurgeryThe Misuse of ‘No Significant Difference’ in British Orthopaedic Literature (2008)The Misuse of ‘No Significant…Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A 20-Year Review of Reporting Standards, Methodologic Quality, and Impact (2008)Randomized Controlled Trials …Evidence-Based Plastic Surgery (2008)Evidence-Based Plastic SurgeryEmpirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)The Past Informs the Present, Academic New Media Pitfalls: A Primer for Plastic Surgeons (2019)The 100 Most-cited Articles in Abdominoplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis (2021)Five decades of research on immediate implant therapy: A modern bibliometric network analysis via Altmetric and level of evidence mapping (2024)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Level of Evidence in Four Selected Rehabilitation Journals (2011)Deficiencies of effectiveness of intervention studies in veterinary medicine: a cross-sectional survey of ten leading veterinary and medical journals (2016)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)The evidence base for oral and maxillofacial surgery: 10-year analysis of two journals (2010)Evidence-Based Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (2013)An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Plastic Surgery Journals (2018)A power primer. (1992)THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000 (2002)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery needs improvement: A systematic review (2012)Sample size in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: are numbers justified? (2013)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Research synthesis in veterinary science: Narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2015)Incomplete reporting of experimental studies and items associated with risk of bias in veterinary research (2019)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)A Systematic Review of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials (2016)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies (2014)Paediatric surgical trials, their fragility index, and why to avoid using it to evaluate results (2022)#PlasticSurgery (2016)#SocialMedia for the Academic Plastic Surgeon—Elevating the Brand (2016)So, Do You Want to Be Facebook Friends? How Social Media Have Changed Plastic Surgery and Medicine Forever (2017)#PlasticSurgery: A Comparative Deep Dive Analysis into Social Media and Plastic Surgery (2020)A Proposed Approach for Conducting Studies That Use Data From Social Media Platforms (2021)A retrospective analysis of social media posts pertaining to COVID-19 vaccination side effects (2021)The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials (1998)The Quality of Systematic Reviews in Hand Surgery (2013)Educational Research, Policymaking and Practice (2002)The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews (2013)Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994The scandal of poor medical research897 cited

Cited by

  • 2010A Detailed Analysis of Level I Evidence (Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-Analyses) in Five Plastic Surgery Journals to Date: 1978 to 200951 cited
  • 2014Type II error and statistical power in reports of small animal clinical trials49 cited
  • 2012A Systematic Review of Power and Sample Size Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials within Plastic Surgery47 cited
  • 2013Levels of Evidence in Cosmetic Surgery45 cited
  • 2008Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A 20-Year Review of Reporting Standards, Methodologic Quality, and Impact43 cited
  • 2018Harnessing Social Media to Advance Research in Plastic Surgery34 cited
  • 2008Evidence-Based Plastic Surgery31 cited
  • 2017A Proposal to Mitigate the Consequences of Type 2 Error in Surgical Science30 cited
  • 2009Evidence-Based Plastic Surgery30 cited
  • 2010Evidence-based burn care—An assessment of the methodological quality of research published in burn care journals from 1982 to 200829 cited
  • 2008The Misuse of ‘No Significant Difference’ in British Orthopaedic Literature26 cited
  • 2011Quality of reporting according to the CONSORT, STROBE and Timmer instrument at the American Burn Association (ABA) annual meetings 2000 and 200818 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work